Journal • March 1, 2024

What Town Centres Need From Digital — And What They Keep Getting Instead

What Town Centres Need From Digital — And What They Keep Getting Instead

What Town Centres Need From Digital — And What They Keep Getting Instead

The decline of the high street is one of those problems that attracts enormous amounts of digital activity without much of it making a measurable difference. New websites get built. Social media channels get launched. Apps get developed, used briefly, and abandoned. The footfall data doesn't change.

This isn't because digital doesn't work for town centres. It's because most of the digital work being commissioned is solving the wrong problem.

The Real Competition

The implicit framing of most town centre digital work is: people would visit more if they knew more about what was available. Therefore, build a better information resource.

This is wrong, or at least incomplete. The person who chose to order online this week knows there are shops in their town centre. The information deficit isn't the barrier. The decision-making moment is the barrier.

The competition for a town centre isn't other town centres. It's the couch. The competition is the alternative of not going out at all — which is lower-friction than any in-person experience can ever be.

Digital tools that help people who have already decided to visit find information once they're there solve a marginal problem. Digital tools that change the decision to visit at all — that make the prospect of a visit feel worth the friction — solve the real one.

What Changes the Decision

The emotional variable in the decision to visit a town centre is not information availability. It's anticipated experience. The question a potential visitor is answering (unconsciously, mostly) is: will this be worth it? Will I find what I'm looking for? Will I encounter something I wasn't expecting that makes the trip feel like more than an errand?

Digital tools that serve this question look different from digital tools that serve the information deficit.

They lead with editorial content rather than comprehensive listings. They surface what's new, what's seasonal, what has a story behind it. They treat the town centre not as a database of available shops but as a place with a character — because that character is the thing that competes with the sofa.

This requires more investment than a directory. It requires content, curation, and ongoing editorial maintenance. Most BIDs are not structured to produce this. The ones that recognise this structural problem and find a way to address it — whether through in-house resource or an external partner — tend to have digital presences that actually generate engagement.

On Measurement

The metric used to evaluate most town centre digital projects is traffic. How many visitors to the website, how many followers on social, how many downloads of the app.

These are not the right metrics. The right metric is: did this digital activity produce an additional visit that would not have happened otherwise?

This is harder to measure, but it's not impossible. QR codes, redemption mechanics, enquiry tracking, and simple post-visit surveys are all tools that connect digital activity to physical footfall. Building these measurement mechanisms into a project from the beginning is the difference between being able to demonstrate value to levy payers and producing another annual report full of website traffic graphs that nobody believes.

The Things That Consistently Work

Across the town centre and BID work we have done, the digital interventions that produce measurable results share three characteristics:

  1. They are mobile-first and fast, because the decision to make a detour happens on a phone on the street, not at a desk
  2. They surface genuinely useful, timely information — offers that are actually valid, events that are actually happening, businesses that are actually open
  3. They are maintained consistently, because a digital resource that goes out of date faster than it gets updated is worse than having nothing at all

None of these are complicated. Most of them are unglamorous. They require commitment rather than creative breakthrough. Which is perhaps why they are rarer than they should be.